Mr. Eric Samuelsen’s My View made my blood boil with
indignation. I can not keep silent. I suggest there are several things he needs
to read immediately. First is Marvin
Olasky’s book The Tragedy of American
Compassion, wherein he reports in great detail how the government take over
of compassionate and charitable services has decimated the family and personal
responsibility for the outcomes of our lives.
Second, are Ezra Taft Benson’s addresses Our Priceless Heritage (Ensign, November 1976), and The Proper
Role of Government (The Improvement Era, Dec. 1968), which outline what
government, particularly the United States government, should be doing and what
they should stay out of. Third is Samuel
L. Blumenfeld’s book Is Public Education
Necessary, which chronicles education in this country and makes a case
against public education. Finally, King
Benjamin’s sermon from Mosiah in The Book
of Mormon, which you mention. What you
neglected to mention is that King Benjamin did not confiscate his people’s wealth
to redistribute to others, but invoked individual guilt as a motivator for his
people to give freely to others. He also
proclaimed that he had worked for his own living so his people would not have ‘taxes,
grievous to be borne.’
I do not know what history you have studied, but that which
I have studied leads me to opposite conclusions. That individual enterprise is much more
effective at charity and compassionate service than unwieldy governmental
programs run by bureaucrats.
A balanced budget at the expense of defense is a backward
proposition. You, sir, have your
governmental priorities backwards. The
national government is supposed to provide for our defense which is something
we can not do individually. Social
programs, from giving generously to our neighbors in need, to setting up local
school curriculum are best left to individuals and local governments, where
needs are readily perceived and accountability is visible. Confiscating my hard earned money to pay a
bureaucrat to give a pittance to another is theft, pure and simple. I would like the freedom to choose to whom and
to what I give of my time, money and other resources.
I resent my money being taken and given to persons who are immoral,
unrepentant, and unwilling to work (I hate working too and would much rather be
a homemaker for my family), and/or persons who use the money to support
addictions rather than purchasing healthful foods. Working at a convenience store has shown me
how wasteful people are with the government’s redistribution of my money. Persons come in everyday wanting to use their
food stamp card to buy sodas, donuts, chips and candy. They get money out of the ATM on their food
stamp card to buy tobacco products and alcohol.
My tax dollars are supporting their addictions. And you wonder why I’m not for government
compassion. There is no accountability,
no plan for the improvement of lives, just a constant enabling of unhealthy and
immoral practices.
We do not have a healthcare problem in this country. We have a self-discipline and personal
responsibility problem. People smoking,
drinking, drugging and eating themselves into disease and crisis. Not to
mention all the immoral practices that bring on disease and unwanted or
inconvenient pregnancies. Everyone wants
to “have their cake and eat it too.” In
other words, people want to continue their unhealthy and immoral ways and have
someone else pay for fixing it. No
personal responsibility, no bad consequences for actions. There is enough medical care for
everyone. But nobody (individually) wants
to pay for it, let alone live, eat and exercise in ways to keep themselves
healthy and personally responsible for their choices. They want the government to pay. I am the government, and so are you. Remember, government of the people, by the
people and for the people. The
government is not a money making enterprise like Wal-Mart. At this point in time it is a confiscatory and
a deficit spending enterprise; taking money from productive citizens and giving
it to unproductive ones. How is that right?
How is that consistent with the ideals upon which this country was
founded?
The Second Amendment is an embarrassing anachronism? No contemporary relevance? As long as
terrorists (foreign and homegrown) bent on our destruction, stalk us with
illegal weapons we need the freedom and ability to protect ourselves. (No, I
don’t own a gun, we have five children. But that’s another subject.)
Just what do you believe is the ‘promise of America ?’ I thought it was life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness. No guarantees,
just pursuit. But liberty, whatever
became of that concept? Public education
doesn’t answer for or provide that promise.
This country was founded without public education. In fact, all education (schools) in the
seventeenth and eighteenth centuries was of a religious or religion based
nature. Publicly financed education came
into being around 1830 (interesting year).
Somebody got the bright idea that education should be divorced from
religion and should teach children how to act and think without any reference
to God. We can see where that has gotten
us.
There is actually very little that is public about schools,
except the money. I can not, as a member
of the “public” go to a class that interests me in any school. I can’t even walk into a school without first
checking in with the Gestapo in the office.
Students are not permitted to come and go freely, cannot choose courses
that interest them at the time they are interested. Public schools have become factories for
turning out government programmed workers, unable to think for themselves,
curiosity stifled, brainwashed with the approved governmental ideas. What is so good about that? And why shouldn’t students have the right to
pray publicly at school, in the free exercise of their religion? And teaching science versus religion? Science these days takes as much faith in the
unseen and unknown as religion. I’ll
take revealed religion over man made science any day. When will we learn and acknowledge that God
operates on natural laws and allows us to discover them one by one in our
pursuit of “science.” True revealed religion
and science are one and the same.
I do not want to stay the current course because the course
we are on is toward certain destruction.
We need drastic course corrections to bring this nation into line with
safety and protection from the God of this, choice and precious above all others,
nation.
The governments of
the nation, states, counties and cities should look at the way the government
of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints runs things. No deficit spending, no confiscatory
practices, no raising of tithing rates (which is a constant rate for everyone,
rather than a progressive rate punishing those who are more productive),
prudent spending, saving for future needs, pay as you go, and on and on. Look at the great good that is accomplished
by that church! It is a model for the
rest of the world.
Mr. Samuelsen calls himself liberal. I don’t know what to call myself because I
believe the labels liberal and conservative are offensive and divisive. Very few persons are completely either
one. There are too many areas to cover:
finances, social services, morality, national defense, education, commerce, and
so forth. Obedience to God’s laws covers
all areas and aspects of our lives. It
is a return to obedience to His laws and following the living prophet that will
bring this country back to the right course.
Our ills cannot be cured by more government regulation and
taxation. In fact, that will add greatly
to our sorrows. All the ills of the world can be cured by living the teachings
of Jesus Christ, and following the prophet.
The Book of Mormon is a vivid testament to the truthfulness of that
statement.